Splurge/Save

Given that one of these dresses clocks in at $160, and the other at $795, I don’t know that it’s much of a contest. Still, if you didn’t know anything about the accompanying pricetags, which one would you choose? And with less than three weeks until New Years Eve, have you made your plans yet?

9 comments

  1. Amberly said: replied:

    I love the second one because of the cut out in the back and the quality of sequins looks better. :)

    13 Dec 2012 | Reply
  2. I actually prefer the splurge option! That almost NEVER happens

    13 Dec 2012 | Reply
  3. lindsey said: replied:

    I cannot afford to splurge, but I really love that dress! The draping, along with the sequins, is amazing!
    xo,
    Lindsey

    http://www.caviartaste.com

    13 Dec 2012 | Reply
  4. Natalie said: replied:

    I prefer the “save” one! I think the darker sequins are better looking, and I’m not a fan of the bagginess on the “splurge” option. Such a great example of how two identical items can be so disparate in price!

    Natalie
    Name’s Not Ashley

    13 Dec 2012 | Reply
  5. Nancy said: replied:

    The all over sequins are what is most important, so the first one will have an equal affect I feel! Have a wonderful weekend and Happy Holidays!
    xo Nancy
    Powellbrowerhome.com

    14 Dec 2012 | Reply
  6. Ashley said: replied:

    Remember that little number I wore at your wedding. For me, it also has

    N

    Y

    E

    written all over it!

    xoxo,

    AMK

    14 Dec 2012 | Reply
  7. Cait said: replied:

    I actually like the less expensive one better! Always love seeing two similar items with much different price tags compared to each other – points out how much we’re actually paying for the label.

    14 Dec 2012 | Reply
  8. I would have chose the 2nd one. My mom always says that I can go into any store and walk straight up to the most expensive piece in the whole store.

    14 Dec 2012 | Reply
  9. TeeChuk said: replied:

    I’d go for the 2nd dress! The detailing in the back is fab!

    16 Dec 2012 | Reply

Leave a Comment